IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v35y2025i1p28-53_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Free-Riding Issue in Contemporary Organizations: Lessons from the Common Good Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Frémeaux, Sandrine
  • Mercier, Guillaume
  • Grevin, Anouk

Abstract

Free riding involves benefiting from common resources or services while avoiding contributing to their production and maintenance. Few studies have adequately investigated the propensity to overestimate the prevalence of free riding. This is a significant omission, as exaggeration of the phenomenon is often used to justify control and coercion systems. To address this gap, we investigate how the common good approach may mitigate the flaws of a system excessively focused on free-riding risk. In this conceptual paper featuring illustrative vignettes, we argue that the common good perspective is realistic and effective in preventing this excessive attention by promoting trust as an unconditional gift and a response to vulnerability. We discuss the common good perspective’s originality over the dominant approaches and propose a set of ethical and managerial recommendations that may be the best protection against this excessive focus and maybe even against free riding itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Frémeaux, Sandrine & Mercier, Guillaume & Grevin, Anouk, 2025. "The Free-Riding Issue in Contemporary Organizations: Lessons from the Common Good Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 28-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:28-53_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X24000034/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:28-53_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.