IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v34y2024i3p375-408_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-stakeholder Initiatives and Legitimacy: A Deliberative Systems Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Apffelstaedt, Kristin
  • Schrage, Stephanie
  • Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich

Abstract

The legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) as institutions for social and environmental governance in the global economy has received much scholarly attention over the past years. To date, however, research has yet to focus on assessing the legitimacy of MSIs in their interactions with other actors within larger systems of deliberation. Drawing on the deliberative systems perspective developed within deliberative democracy theory, we theorise a normative framework to evaluate the roles of MSIs within the broader systems of governance they co-construct through their interactions with other initiatives, governments, non-governmental organisations, and other external actors. As we demonstrate in our evaluation of the illustrative case of the Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety as a MSI in the context of the Bangladeshi garment industry, this framework can help researchers assess whether a MSI ultimately serves to enhance or undermine the deliberative legitimacy of the overall system of which it forms a part.

Suggested Citation

  • Apffelstaedt, Kristin & Schrage, Stephanie & Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich, 2024. "Multi-stakeholder Initiatives and Legitimacy: A Deliberative Systems Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 375-408, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:34:y:2024:i:3:p:375-408_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X2300012X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:34:y:2024:i:3:p:375-408_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.