IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v32y2022i2p272-298_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence of an Inverted U–Shaped Relationship between Stakeholder Management Performance Variation and Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Laplume, André O.
  • Harrison, Jeffrey S.
  • Zhang, Zhou
  • Yu, Xin
  • Walker, Kent

Abstract

Empirical research is largely supportive of the assertion of instrumental stakeholder theory that a positive relationship exists between “managing for stakeholders” and firm performance. However, despite considerable debate on the subject, the amount of variation across firm investments in stakeholders (stakeholder management performance) has not been adequately investigated. We address this gap using a sample of more than eighteen thousand firm-level observations over ten years. We find evidence to support an inverted U–shaped relationship between variation in stakeholder management performance and Tobin’s q, suggesting that firms that have some imbalance in their stakeholder management, but not too much, perform best. We discuss the implications of our study for instrumental stakeholder theory and managerial practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Laplume, André O. & Harrison, Jeffrey S. & Zhang, Zhou & Yu, Xin & Walker, Kent, 2022. "Evidence of an Inverted U–Shaped Relationship between Stakeholder Management Performance Variation and Firm Performance," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 272-298, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:32:y:2022:i:2:p:272-298_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X21000191/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:32:y:2022:i:2:p:272-298_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.