IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v30y2020i3p361-387_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovering the Logic of Double Effect for Business: Intentions, Proportionality, and Impermissible Harms

Author

Listed:
  • Monge, Rosemarie
  • Hsieh, Nien-hê

Abstract

Business actors often act in ways that may harm other parties. While the law aims to restrict harmful behavior and to provide remedies, legal systems do not anticipate all contingencies and legal regulations are not always well-enforced. This article argues that the logic of double effect (LDE), which has been developed and deployed in other areas of practical ethics, can be useful in helping business actors decide whether or not to pursue potentially harmful activities in commonplace business activity. The article illustrates how LDE helps to explain the exploitative nature of payday lending, the distinction between permissible and impermissible forms of market competition, and the potential wrong of imposing risk of harm on others. The article also addresses foundational debates about LDE itself. We offer the article as an illustration of the sort of “midlevel” theorizing that can address directly the needs of practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Monge, Rosemarie & Hsieh, Nien-hê, 2020. "Recovering the Logic of Double Effect for Business: Intentions, Proportionality, and Impermissible Harms," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 361-387, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:30:y:2020:i:3:p:361-387_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X19000393/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Roncella & Ignacio Ferrero, 2022. "The Ethics of Financial Market Making and Its Implications for High-Frequency Trading," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 139-151, November.
    2. Erin Oldford & John Fiset & Anahit Armenakyan, 2023. "The marginalizing effect of journal submission fees in Accounting and Finance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4611-4650, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:30:y:2020:i:3:p:361-387_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.