IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v28y2018i03p275-300_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Leadership Ethics of Machiavelli’s Prince

Author

Listed:
  • Cosans, Christopher E.
  • Reina, Christopher S.

Abstract

This article examines the place of Machiavelli’s Prince in the history of ethics and the history of leadership philosophy. Close scrutiny indicates that Machiavelli advances an ethical system for leadership that involves uprooting corruption and establishing rule of law. He draws on history and current affairs in order to obtain a realistic understanding of human behavior that forms a basis for a consequentialist ethics. While he claims a good leader might do bad things, this is in situations where necessity constrains a prince to choosing the “least bad” course of action. Furthermore, Machiavelli advocates winning the goodwill of followers through leadership as a source of power. Machiavelli’s leadership ethics has a sophistication not fully enjoyed by his reputation in management scholarship. He would not score as especially “Machiavellian” on the Mach IV. Many of his ideas contain seeds for theories that are now considered important for leadership today.

Suggested Citation

  • Cosans, Christopher E. & Reina, Christopher S., 2018. "The Leadership Ethics of Machiavelli’s Prince," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 275-300, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:28:y:2018:i:03:p:275-300_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X17000136/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moutusy Maity & Nandita Roy & Doyeeta Majumder & Prasanta Chakravarty, 2024. "Revisiting the Received Image of Machiavelli in Business Ethics Through a Close Reading of The Prince and Discourses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 231-252, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:28:y:2018:i:03:p:275-300_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.