IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v14y2004i03p377-398_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Structural Origins of Conflicts of Interest in the Accounting Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Boyd, Colin

Abstract

This paper describes the professional ethical context behind the failure of Arthur Andersen’s audit of Enron. It is argued that the evolution of extreme industrial concentration in the accounting profession, and the subsequent unrestrained diversification of the “Big Five” accounting firms were the sources of multiple conflicts of interest that were unresolved by the time of the Enron debacle. In the post-Enron era, the problems of commercial conflicts of interest and of highly concentrated power in the profession remain important issues. Accountancy is believed by its practitioners to be a profession, not a commercial venture. (Magill, Previts, and Robinson 1998: 4)

Suggested Citation

  • Boyd, Colin, 2004. "The Structural Origins of Conflicts of Interest in the Accounting Profession," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 377-398, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:14:y:2004:i:03:p:377-398_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00007065/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Espinosa-Pike, Marcela & Barrainkua, Itsaso, 2016. "An exploratory study of the pressures and ethical dilemmas in the audit conflict," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 10-20.
    2. Riad Abdulraouf, 2007. "Les Fondements De L'Audit Par Les « Business Risks » : Motivations Professionnelles Ou Raisons Économiques ?," Post-Print halshs-00543074, HAL.
    3. Sarowar Hossain & Jeff Coulton & Jenny Jing Wang, 2023. "Client Importance and Audit Quality at the Individual Audit Partner, Office, and Firm Levels," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(2), pages 650-696, June.
    4. Sabau Elena Monica & Sgardea Florinel Marian & Tutu Anca & Turlea Carmen, 2009. "Le Livre Des Risques – Instrument Efficace Dans L’Application De La Strategie D’Audit Interne Fonde Sur Les Risques (Risk Based Auditing)," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 1158-1163, May.
    5. Lamar Pierce & Michael W. Toffel, 2010. "The Role of Organizational Scope and Governance in Strengthening Private Monitoring," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-004, Harvard Business School, revised Feb 2012.
    6. Stephen A. Zeff & Vaughan Radcliffe & Sally Gunz, 2014. "Accounting and Auditing Activities of the Ontario Securities Commission, 1960s to 2008 Part 3: The Fifth Chief Accountant, 1996–2008," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 223-252, December.
    7. Maria Ishaque, 2021. "Managing Conflict of Interests in Professional Accounting Firms: A Research Synthesis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 537-555, March.
    8. Lamar Pierce & Michael W. Toffel, 2013. "The Role of Organizational Scope and Governance in Strengthening Private Monitoring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1558-1584, October.
    9. Espinosa Díaz, Yuli Samary & Revelo Mantilla, Jessica Tatiana & Ballesteros Sarabia, Victor Manuel, 2020. "Nociones del escepticismo profesional del Contador Público en ejercicio de las auditorías: una perspectiva teórica," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 21(2), pages 266-282, July.
    10. Torbjörn Tagesson & Sven-Olof Yrjö Collin, 2016. "Corporate governance influencing compliance with the Swedish Code of Corporate Governance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(3), pages 262-277, August.
    11. Olivier Charpateau, 2007. "Ethique De L'Auditeur Et Capacite A Reveler Une Erreur : Comparaison Des Auditeurs Financiers Et Operationnels," Post-Print halshs-00543243, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:14:y:2004:i:03:p:377-398_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.