IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v13y2003i04p453-477_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managers as Judges in Employee Disputes: An Occasion for Moral Imagination

Author

Listed:
  • Moberg, Dennis J.

Abstract

Employee-employee conflicts are common occasions for managerial intervention. In judging such disputes, managers bring to encounters a frame that is not conducive to employee due process. Making managers aware of their legal responsibilities in resolving employee disputes is a poor substitute for managers’ understanding and implementation of their ethical due process obligations. Moreover, moral imagination is necessary in order to counter the effects of the managerial frame that employees are either not worthy of due process protections or that such protections are not a priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Moberg, Dennis J., 2003. "Managers as Judges in Employee Disputes: An Occasion for Moral Imagination," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 453-477, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:13:y:2003:i:04:p:453-477_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00006709/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheldene Simola, 2012. "Exploring “Embodied Care” in Relation to Social Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(4), pages 473-484, June.
    2. Alexei M. Marcoux, 2006. "The Concept of Business in Business Ethics," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 22(Spring 20), pages 50-67.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:13:y:2003:i:04:p:453-477_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.