IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v29y2024ip-_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From bias to black boxes: understanding and managing the risks of AI – an actuarial perspective

Author

Listed:
  • du Preez, Valerie
  • Bennet, Shaun
  • Byrne, Matthew
  • Couloumy, Aurelién
  • Das, Arijit
  • Dessain, Jean
  • Galbraith, Richard
  • King, Paul
  • Mutanga, Victor
  • Schiller, Frank
  • Zaaiman, Stefan
  • Moehrke, Patrick
  • van Heerden, Lara

Abstract

We explore some of the risks related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) from an actuarial perspective based on research from a transregional industry focus group. We aim to define the key gaps and challenges faced when implementing and utilising modern modelling techniques within traditional actuarial tasks from a risk perspective and in the context of professional standards and regulations. We explore best practice guidelines to attempt to define an ideal approach and propose potential next steps to help reach the ideal approach. We aim to focus on the considerations, initially from a traditional actuarial perspective and then, if relevant, consider some implications for non-traditional actuarial work, by way of examples. The examples are not intended to be exhaustive. The group considered potential issues and challenges of using AI, related to the following key themes: Ethical ○ Bias, fairness, and discrimination ○ Individualisation of risk assessment ○ Public interest Professional ○ Interpretability and explainability ○ Transparency, reproducibility, and replicability ○ Validation and governance Lack of relevant skills available Wider themes This paper aims to provide observations that could help inform industry and professional guidelines or discussion or to support industry practitioners. It is not intended to replace current regulation, actuarial standards, or guidelines. The paper is aimed at an actuarial and insurance technical audience, specifically those who are utilising or developing AI, and actuarial industry bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • du Preez, Valerie & Bennet, Shaun & Byrne, Matthew & Couloumy, Aurelién & Das, Arijit & Dessain, Jean & Galbraith, Richard & King, Paul & Mutanga, Victor & Schiller, Frank & Zaaiman, Stefan & Moehrke,, 2024. "From bias to black boxes: understanding and managing the risks of AI – an actuarial perspective," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:29:y:2024:i::p:-_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321724000060/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:29:y:2024:i::p:-_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.