IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v29y2024ip-_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sufficient mathematical conditions for identical estimation of the liability for remaining coverage under the general measurement model and premium allocation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Timothy
  • Jagga, Antonie

Abstract

Paragraph 53(a) of the new insurance accounting standard IFRS 17 suggests there is a relationship between the liability for remaining coverage (“LFRC”) calculated under the general measurement model (“GMM”) and premium allocation approach (“PAA”), although it is not immediately obvious how the two are related or could result in a similar estimate for the LFRC. This paper explores the underlying relationship between the GMM and PAA through the equivalence principle and presents a set of sufficient mathematical conditions that result in an identical LFRC when calculated under the GMM and PAA. An illustrative example is included to demonstrate how the sufficient conditions can be applied in practice and the optimisation opportunities offered to actuaries and accountants when conducting PAA eligibility testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Timothy & Jagga, Antonie, 2024. "Sufficient mathematical conditions for identical estimation of the liability for remaining coverage under the general measurement model and premium allocation approach," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:29:y:2024:i::p:-_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321724000242/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:29:y:2024:i::p:-_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.