IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v22y2017i03p636-656_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product options for enhanced retirement income

Author

Listed:
  • Donnelly, C.
  • Young, J.

Abstract

A new stream of research proposes how people can increase their income in retirement by pooling their mortality risk. How one of these mortality risk-sharing rules could be implemented in practice, as part of a retirement income scheme, is considered. A potential advantage of the scheme is that a retiree’s housing wealth can be monetised to provide an income stream. This would mean that retirees can continue living in their home, without needing to downsize. It may be most attractive to the millions of single pensioners, particularly those who are “asset-rich and cash-poor”. Other types of assets that could be included and how to mitigate selection risks are assessed. A way of smoothing the raw mortality credits in order to make the scheme more appealing to potential members is proposed. An illustrative premium calculation suggests that the cost of the smoothing is very small compared to the potential attractiveness of an enhanced, smoothed income.

Suggested Citation

  • Donnelly, C. & Young, J., 2017. "Product options for enhanced retirement income," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 636-656, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:22:y:2017:i:03:p:636-656_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321717000228/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xie, Lin & Chen, Lv & Qian, Linyi & Li, Danping & Yang, Zhixin, 2023. "Optimal investment and consumption strategies for pooled annuity with partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 129-155.
    2. Denuit, Michel & Hieber, Peter & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Mortality credits within large survivor funds," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021038, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    3. Michel Denuit & Raluca Vernic, 2018. "Bivariate Bernoulli Weighted Sums and Distribution of Single-Period Tontine Benefits," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1403-1416, December.
    4. Thomas Bernhardt & Catherine Donnelly, 2020. "Quantifying the trade-off between income stability and the number of members in a pooled annuity fund," Papers 2010.16009, arXiv.org.
    5. Devolder, Pierre, 2019. "Une alternative a la pension a points : le compte individuel pension en euros," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019011, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. Chen, An & Rach, Manuel, 2019. "Options on tontines: An innovative way of combining tontines and annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-192.
    7. Denuit, M. & Robert, C.Y., 2020. "From risk sharing to pure premium for a large number of heterogeneous losses," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2020015, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    8. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "From risk sharing to pure premium for a large number of heterogeneous losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 116-126.
    9. Denuit, Michel, 2019. "Size-biased transform and conditional mean risk sharing, with application to P2P insurance and tontines," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019010, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:22:y:2017:i:03:p:636-656_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.