IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bpubpo/v7y2023i3p773-807_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing spillovers from food, energy and water conservation behaviors using insights from systems perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar, Pranay
  • Caggiano, Holly
  • Cuite, Cara
  • Felder, Frank A.
  • Shwom, Rachael

Abstract

Spillover effects are considered important in evaluating the impacts of food, energy and water (FEW) conservation behaviors for limiting global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Failure to account for all possible spillovers, or indirect and unintended results of an intervention, not only obscures valuable information pertaining to the dynamic interactions across domains but also results in biased estimates. In this study, we first systematically reviewed articles that investigate the idea that the performance of one pro-environmental behavior influences the conduct of subsequent behaviors(s) from the FEW domains. From our review of 48 studies in the last decade, we note that a big part of the discussion on spillover concerns the nature and direction of causal relationships between individual FEW conservation behaviors. We identify a critical gap in the literature regarding the distinction between spillover effects caused by the interventions as distinct from those caused by the primary behaviors. Next, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of the reviewed empirical studies to find a modest but overall positive spillover effect. Finally, we reviewed the theoretical and methodological plurality in the FEW spillover literature using a systemic thinking lens to summarize what is already known and identify future challenges and research opportunities with significant policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar, Pranay & Caggiano, Holly & Cuite, Cara & Felder, Frank A. & Shwom, Rachael, 2023. "Analyzing spillovers from food, energy and water conservation behaviors using insights from systems perspective," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 773-807, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:7:y:2023:i:3:p:773-807_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398063X22000410/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:7:y:2023:i:3:p:773-807_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.