IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bpubpo/v7y2023i3p662-678_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Default options: a powerful behavioral tool to increase COVID-19 contact tracing app acceptance in Latin America?

Author

Listed:
  • Boruchowicz, Cynthia
  • Lopez Boo, Florencia
  • Roseth, Benjamin
  • Tejerina, Luis

Abstract

Given the rates of transmission of COVID-19, relying only on manual contact tracing might be infeasible to control the epidemic without sustained costly lockdowns or rapid vaccination efforts. In the first study of its kind in Latin America, we find through a phone survey of a nationally representative sample of ten countries that an opt-out regime (automatic installation) increases self-reported intention to accept a contact tracing app with exposure notification by 22 percentage points compared to an opt-in regime (voluntary installation). This effect is triple the size and of opposite sign of the effect found in Europe and the United States, potentially due to lower concerns regarding privacy and lower levels of interpersonal trust. We see that an opt-out regime is more effective in increasing willingness to accept for those who do not trust the government or do not use their smartphones for financial transactions. The local severity of the pandemic does not affect our results, but feeling personally at risk increases intent to accept such apps in general. These results can shed light on the use of default options not only for contact tracing apps but in public health overall in the context of a pandemic in Latin America.

Suggested Citation

  • Boruchowicz, Cynthia & Lopez Boo, Florencia & Roseth, Benjamin & Tejerina, Luis, 2023. "Default options: a powerful behavioral tool to increase COVID-19 contact tracing app acceptance in Latin America?," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 662-678, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:7:y:2023:i:3:p:662-678_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398063X21000385/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:7:y:2023:i:3:p:662-678_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.