IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bpubpo/v7y2023i2p518-531_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free-baiting: policy applications for freeness removal and the zero price effect

Author

Listed:
  • LOWENS, ETHAN

Abstract

This paper explores “free-baiting” as a behavioral policy tool for reducing participation in socially undesirable activities. Empirical evidence establishes that when a good or activity ceases to be free, consumption plummets. A free-baiting policy creates conditions of freeness in order to subsequently take advantage of the discouraging effects of freeness removal. The initial free phase shifts consumers’ reference price for the target activity to zero. Subsequently, prices are returned to market levels – a staggering price increase. Behavioral factors enhance the salience of that price increase. It occurs along the steepest part of the money utility curve. It is especially salient because it is presented as a loss. In addition, it may trigger the endowment effect: forcing people to give something up in order to partake in the target activity once it is no longer free. Moreover, these discouraging effects can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of other interventions. Free-baiting manufactures a policy window, creating a moment in which many consumers simultaneously confront obstacles to the target activity. The effects of free-baiting are illustrated using several hypothetical interventions, including rush-hour roadway tolls, sugary beverages, gasoline and tobacco.

Suggested Citation

  • Lowens, Ethan, 2023. "Free-baiting: policy applications for freeness removal and the zero price effect," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 518-531, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:518-531_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398063X20000561/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:518-531_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.