IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v5y1975i04p516-519_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Social Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Goodin, Robert E.

Abstract

Cross-cutting cleavages do seem to help moderate social conflict.1 This can be explained in either of two ways. One argument focuses on the logic of electoral competition. Where parties must appeal to an electorate with diverse tastes along many dimensions, politicians must take moderate positions (defined as near the median voter) in most dimensions of cleavage if they are to win. A socialist party which draws its support from both Protestants and Catholics cannot take extreme positions on the religious question without alienating potential supporters and jeopardizing its electoral chances.2

Suggested Citation

  • Goodin, Robert E., 1975. "Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Social Conflict," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 516-519, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:5:y:1975:i:04:p:516-519_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712340000836X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iulia Cioroianu, 2021. "An agent-based model of cooperation with cross-cutting identity dimensions," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 49-75, May.
    2. K Amber Curtis, 2014. "Inclusive versus exclusive: A cross-national comparison of the effects of subnational, national, and supranational identity," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 521-546, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:5:y:1975:i:04:p:516-519_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.