IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v55y2025ip-_40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-Muslim Bias in Foreign Policy Attitudes: Experimental Evidence from Thirteen European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Findor, Andrej
  • Hlatky, Roman
  • Hruška, Matej
  • Kironská, Kristína

Abstract

Intergroup attitudes and identity ties can shape foreign policy preferences. Anti-Muslim bias is particularly salient in the USA and the UK, but little work assesses whether this bias generalizes to other countries. We evaluate the extent of anti-Muslim bias in foreign policy attitudes through harmonized survey experiments in thirteen European countries (N=19,673). Experimental vignettes present factual reports of religious persecution by China, counter-stereotypically depicting Muslims as victims. We find evidence of anti-Muslim bias. Participants are less opposed to persecution and less likely to support intervention when Muslims, as opposed to other religious groups, are persecuted. However, this bias is not present in all countries. Exploratory analyses underscore that pre-existing intergroup attitudes and shared group identity moderate how group-based evaluations shape foreign policy attitudes. We provide extensive cross-national evidence that anti-Muslim bias is country-specific and that social identity ties and intergroup attitudes influence foreign policy preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Findor, Andrej & Hlatky, Roman & Hruška, Matej & Kironská, Kristína, 2025. "Anti-Muslim Bias in Foreign Policy Attitudes: Experimental Evidence from Thirteen European Countries," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123425000134/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:55:y:2025:i::p:-_40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.