IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i4p1496-1505_29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misconduct by Voters' Own Representatives Does Not Affect Voters' Generalized Political Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly, Edmund
  • Tilley, James

Abstract

One reason given for declining levels of trust in politicians and institutions is the incidence of scandals involving voters' representatives. Politicians implicated in scandals, especially financial scandals, typically see their constituents' support for them decrease. It has been suggested that these specific negative judgements about a representative's misconduct spill over onto diffuse political trust in the system as a whole. We argue that the 2009 Parliamentary expenses scandal in the United Kingdom is a strong test of these scandal spillover effects in a non-experimental context. Yet, using a multilevel analysis of survey and representative implication data, we find no evidence for these effects. This is despite voters being aware of their MP's scandal implication, and this awareness affecting voters' support for their own MP. We conclude that voters' judgements about their constituency representatives are unlikely to affect their diffuse political trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly, Edmund & Tilley, James, 2024. "Misconduct by Voters' Own Representatives Does Not Affect Voters' Generalized Political Trust," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(4), pages 1496-1505, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1496-1505_29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123424000383/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1496-1505_29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.