IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i4p1457-1467_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Preferences Over Changes to the Composition of Government Tax Revenue

Author

Listed:
  • Barnes, Lucy
  • de Romémont, Julia
  • Lauderdale, Benjamin E.

Abstract

How governments raise tax revenue is at the core of domestic political conflict. Public opinion towards taxation is measured generally and qualitatively by many surveys, but previous research has not closely linked public preferences to the budget problem faced by governments regarding how best to raise or cut a marginal quantity of revenue. We present results from a novel tax preference experiment in which UK respondents are given choices over different tax ‘levers’ that are expected to raise or cut equal revenue. We find that while different tax levers vary substantially in their popularity, there is a ‘hidden consensus’ regarding different tax levers across income levels and partisanship of the respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Barnes, Lucy & de Romémont, Julia & Lauderdale, Benjamin E., 2024. "Public Preferences Over Changes to the Composition of Government Tax Revenue," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(4), pages 1457-1467, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1457-1467_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123424000127/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1457-1467_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.