IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i4p1404-1423_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race

Author

Listed:
  • Hjortskov, Morten
  • Andersen, Simon Calmar

Abstract

Understanding which political candidates are elected for office is fundamental to democracy and political science. Whereas there is much agreement that party affiliation is one of the most important candidate characteristics to voters, evidence regarding the gender and race of the candidate is mixed. We suggest voters have lexicographic preferences, meaning they rank their preferences and focus primarily on the candidate's party affiliation. Second-order preferences such as gender and race are mostly necessary when there is a tie in first-order preferences when voters choose between two same-party candidates or have no party information. We show how conjoint experiments can be used to test for lexicographic preferences and use data from a US-representative sample and a pre-registered replication to confirm that in the United States, gender and race are second-order preferences. Lexicographic preferences provide a theoretical lens explaining some of the mixed results of gender and race in the candidate literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Hjortskov, Morten & Andersen, Simon Calmar, 2024. "Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(4), pages 1404-1423, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1404-1423_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123424000048/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1404-1423_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.