IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i4p1115-1132_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Information Do Politicians Pay Attention To? Evidence from a Field Experiment and Interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Senninger, Roman
  • Seeberg, Henrik B.

Abstract

Politicians are exposed to a constant flow of information about societal problems. However, they have limited resources and need to prioritize. So, which information should they pay attention to? Previous research identifies four types of information that may matter: public concern about a problem, problem attention by rival parties, news stories about problems, and statistical problem indicators. We are the first to contrast the four types of information through a field experiment with more than 6,000 candidates and multiple elite interviews in Denmark. The candidates received an email invitation to access a specially tailored report that randomly highlighted one of the four types of information. Statistical indicators and public opinion were accessed the most (26.9 per cent and 26.5 per cent of candidates in the two conditions). Our results provide new and important evidence about the types of information politicians consider when addressing societal problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Senninger, Roman & Seeberg, Henrik B., 2024. "Which Information Do Politicians Pay Attention To? Evidence from a Field Experiment and Interviews," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(4), pages 1115-1132, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1115-1132_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712342400005X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:1115-1132_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.