IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i3p629-648_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Witch Hunts? Electoral Cycles and Corruption Lawsuits in Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • Feierherd, Germán
  • Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel
  • Tuñón, Guadalupe

Abstract

Courts prosecuting corruption serve a critical horizontal accountability function, but they can also play a role in moments of vertical accountability when voters can sanction corrupt candidates. This article documents the strategic use of corruption lawsuits, demonstrating the presence of an electoral cycle in filing new corruption accusations against politicians. Using an original dataset of daily corruption complaints filed in federal courts against members of Argentina's main political coalitions between 2013 and 2021, we document increased corruption accusations against and by politicians in the periods immediately preceding an election. A second dataset of daily media coverage of corruption accusations in two leading newspapers suggests that corruption is more salient before elections, offering politicians a temporal focal point to prepare and launch especially impactful lawsuits. Our findings shed new light on using courts for accountability and debates about the so-called ‘lawfare’ in Latin America.

Suggested Citation

  • Feierherd, Germán & Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel & Tuñón, Guadalupe, 2024. "Witch Hunts? Electoral Cycles and Corruption Lawsuits in Argentina," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 629-648, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:3:p:629-648_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712342300042X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:3:p:629-648_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.