IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v54y2024i2p456-473_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Protest Influence Political Speech? Evidence from UK Climate Protest, 2017–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Barrie, Christopher
  • Fleming, Thomas G.
  • Rowan, Sam S.

Abstract

How does protest affect political speech? Protest is an important form of political claim-making, yet our understanding of its influence on how individual legislators communicate remains limited. Our paper thus extends a theoretical framework on protests as information about voter preferences, and evaluates it using crowd-sourced protest data from the 2017–2019 Fridays for Future protests in the UK. We combine these data with ~2.4m tweets from 553 legislators over this period and text data from ~150k parliamentary speech records. We find that local protests prompted MPs to speak more about the climate, but only online. These results demonstrate that protest can shape the timing and substance of political communication by individual elected representatives. They also highlight an important difference between legislators' offline and online speech, suggesting that more work is needed to understand how political strategies differ across these arenas.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrie, Christopher & Fleming, Thomas G. & Rowan, Sam S., 2024. "Does Protest Influence Political Speech? Evidence from UK Climate Protest, 2017–2019," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 456-473, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:2:p:456-473_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123423000376/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:54:y:2024:i:2:p:456-473_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.