IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v53y2023i1p261-268_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proportional Representation and Right-Wing Populism: Evidence from Electoral System Change in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Becher, Michael
  • Menéndez González, Irene
  • Stegmueller, Daniel

Abstract

How much do electoral institutions matter for the rise of populist parties? Evidence on this question is mixed, with some scholars arguing that the role of electoral rules is small. We provide new evidence for the impact of electoral system change. The UK's adoption of a proportional electoral system for European elections in 1999 provides a unique opportunity to study the link between electoral rules and the ascendancy of right-wing populist parties. Employing both synthetic control and difference-in-difference methods, we estimate that the electoral reform increased the vote share of right-wing populists by about 12 to 13.5 percentage points on average. During a time when populism was rising across Europe, the reform abruptly shifted populist votes in the UK above the European trend and above more plausible comparison cases. Our results also imply that caution is needed when empirical results based on partial reforms are extrapolated to electoral system change.

Suggested Citation

  • Becher, Michael & Menéndez González, Irene & Stegmueller, Daniel, 2023. "Proportional Representation and Right-Wing Populism: Evidence from Electoral System Change in Europe," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 261-268, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:1:p:261-268_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123421000703/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:53:y:2023:i:1:p:261-268_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.