IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v50y2020i2p621-640_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Garrett, Kristin N.
  • Bankert, Alexa

Abstract

Partisan bias and hostility have increased substantially over the last few decades in the American electorate, and previous work shows that partisan strength and sorting help drive this trend. Drawing on insights from moral psychology, however, we posit that partisan moral convictions heighten affective polarization beyond the effects of partisanship, increasing partisan animosity and copartisan favoritism. Testing this theory using data from two national samples and novel measures of affective polarization in everyday life, we find that people who tend to moralize politics display more partisan bias, distance and hostility, irrespective of partisan strength. These results shed light on a different moral divide that separates the American public and raise key normative questions about moral conviction and electoral politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Garrett, Kristin N. & Bankert, Alexa, 2020. "The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 621-640, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:50:y:2020:i:2:p:621-640_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712341700059X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mechtenberg, Lydia & Perino, Grischa & Treich, Nicolas & Tyran, Jean-Robert & Wang, Stephanie W., 2024. "Self-signaling in voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Feinstein, Yuval & David, Geffen Ben, 2024. "United but Divided. The Segmented Rally in a Polarized Society in Wartime," SocArXiv wpjbz, Center for Open Science.
    3. Tyran, Jean-Robert & Mechtenberg, Lydia & Perino, Grischa & Treich, Nicolas & Wang, Stephanie, 2021. "Self-Signaling in Moral Voting," CEPR Discussion Papers 15645, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Kelly Kirkland & Paul a M van Lange & Drew Gorenz & Khandis Blake & Catherine E Amiot & Liisi Ausmees & Peter Baguma & Oumar Barry & Maja Becker & Michal Bilewicz & Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat & Robert, 2024. "High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization," Post-Print hal-04670509, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:50:y:2020:i:2:p:621-640_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.