IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v46y2016i02p437-456_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Majorities and Minarets: Religious Freedom and Public Space

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, David

Abstract

The problem raised when democratic majorities take decisions that impose restrictions on religious minorities may be avoided through ‘the strategy of privatization’, but not when the issue is the character of public space. This article considers a challenging case: the Swiss referendum decision to ban any future construction of Islamic minarets. It examines two grounds for opposition: the human right to freedom of religion, and the liberal principle of equal treatment of cultures. It argues that the human right is too limited, and that the equal treatment principle can be trumped by considerations of national identity when public space is involved. Nevertheless, the content of that identity and its public expression must remain open to democratic deliberation, and the Swiss decision can be faulted on those grounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, David, 2016. "Majorities and Minarets: Religious Freedom and Public Space," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 437-456, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:46:y:2016:i:02:p:437-456_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123414000131/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakob Huber & Fabio Wolkenstein, 2018. "Gentrification and occupancy rights," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 17(4), pages 378-397, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:46:y:2016:i:02:p:437-456_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.