IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v43y2013i03p629-650_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Policy Position Choice of Europarties: The Effect of Legislative Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Klüver, Heike
  • Rodon, Toni

Abstract

While Europarties have received increasing attention in recent years, little is known about how they arrive at common policy positions, given their strong internal ideological heterogeneity. In order to explain position formation within Europarties, this article argues that national parties compete with each other in an attempt to upload their own policy positions to their Europarty. The article hypothesizes that their ability to succeed in these attempts depends on their legislative resources. The argument is tested by analysing position formation within the four major Europarties for all European Parliament elections between 1979 and 2004. The empirical results confirm that position choice is skewed towards parties with a large seat share, which has important implications for political representation in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Klüver, Heike & Rodon, Toni, 2013. "Explaining Policy Position Choice of Europarties: The Effect of Legislative Resources," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 629-650, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:43:y:2013:i:03:p:629-650_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123412000543/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ludvig Norman & Wouter Wolfs, 2022. "Is the Governance of Europe's Transnational Party System Contributing to EU Democracy?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 463-479, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:43:y:2013:i:03:p:629-650_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.