IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v40y2010i04p759-779_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Origins of Electoral Volatility in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ferree, Karen E.

Abstract

This article utilizes the statistical analysis of an original dataset of African legislative seat volatility levels and three case studies to demonstrate that the size and configuration of politically salient ethnic groups bear a strong relationship with patterns of legislative seat volatility in Africa. Legislative seat volatility is highest in countries where either no social group is large enough to form a majority on its own, or a majority group contains within itself a second smaller majority group; it is lowest in countries where one, and only one, group forms a majority. In contrast, most standard explanations for volatility, including variations in economic performance, democratic period of origin and democratic duration, do not appear relevant in the African context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferree, Karen E., 2010. "The Social Origins of Electoral Volatility in Africa," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(4), pages 759-779, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:40:y:2010:i:04:p:759-779_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123410000244/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeremy Bowles & Benjamin Marx, 2022. "Turnover and Accountability in Africa's Parliaments," Working Papers hal-03873800, HAL.
    2. Michelle Kuenzi & Hafthor Erlingsson & John P. Tuman, 2021. "The Role of International Factors in Electoral Volatility in Latin America: An Examination of Structural Adjustment," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    3. Jennifer M. Larson & Janet I. Lewis, 2017. "Ethnic Networks," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 350-364, April.
    4. Kwabena Asomanin Anaman & Gbensuglo Alidu Bukari, 2019. "Political Economy Analysis of Voter Participation and Choices in National Elections in Ghana¡¯s Fourth Republican Era," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 174-198, December.
    5. David F Damore & Michelle Kuenzi, 2019. "Executive turnovers in sub-Saharan Africa," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(1), pages 21-40, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:40:y:2010:i:04:p:759-779_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.