IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v27y1997i02p273-285_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility Using Semiparametric Models

Author

Listed:
  • Young, Virginia R.

Abstract

To use Bayesian analysis to model insurance losses, one usually chooses a parametric conditional loss distribution for each risk and a parametric prior distribution to describe how the conditional distributions vary across the risks. A criticism of this method is that the prior distribution can be difficult to choose and the resulting model may not represent the loss data very well. In this paper, we apply techniques from nonparametric density estimation to estimate the prior. We use the estimated model to calculate the predictive mean of future claims given past claims. We illustrate our method with simulated data from a mixture of a lognormal conditional over a lognormal prior and find that the estimated predictive mean is more accurate than the linear Bühlmann credibility estimator, even when we use a conditional that is not lognormal.

Suggested Citation

  • Young, Virginia R., 1997. "Credibility Using Semiparametric Models," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 273-285, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:27:y:1997:i:02:p:273-285_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036100012083/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Young, Virginia R., 2000. "Credibility using semiparametric models and a loss function with a constancy penalty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2-3), pages 151-156, May.
    2. Huang, Xiaowei & Song, Lixin & Liang, Yanchun, 2003. "Semiparametric credibility ratemaking using a piecewise linear prior," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 585-593, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:27:y:1997:i:02:p:273-285_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.