IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v69y1975i01p11-20_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Archetypes and Political Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Laponce, J. A.

Abstract

Assuming that the symbols demonstrated to be important to the understanding of art, literature and religion are likely to be equally useful in the study of politics leads the author to identify seven basic notations: the point, the circle, the square, the dividing line (either vertical or horizontal), and the directional line (either vertical or horizontal). The article speculates on the consequences of casting political thoughts in spatial frameworks developed out of these basic notations. Special attention is given to the Left-Right and Up-Down dimensions and to the problem of the congruence between political ideology and its underlying spatial archetype.

Suggested Citation

  • Laponce, J. A., 1975. "Spatial Archetypes and Political Perceptions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(1), pages 11-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:69:y:1975:i:01:p:11-20_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400241300/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, 1982. "Fakten oder Programmatik?: Die Thesen von Murphy et al. über den Bedeutungswandel von "links" und "rechts" und das gegenwärtige Verständnis der politischen Richtungsbegriffe in der," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(2), pages 214-224.
    2. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, 1982. "Conflicting modes of political orientation or what happens to the German left?: The case of West-Berlin. Paper prepared for the conference on "Representation and the State - Problems of governabi," EconStor Research Reports 112694, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:69:y:1975:i:01:p:11-20_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.