IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v65y1971i04p1081-1101_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comment: On Issues and Nonissues in the Study of Power

Author

Listed:
  • Frey, Frederick W.

Abstract

This essay attempts to be at once a comment on some of the many significant points raised in Professor Wolfinger's article and a statement of a perspective on the issue of the “nonissue” in community power analysis. It is not, however, intended as another salvo in the “elitist-pluralist controversy.”The dispute between “elitists,” “pluralists,” “neo-elitists,” “neopluralists?” et al. has been much with us. A number of valuable ideas regarding approaches and methods for power analysis have, of course, emerged from the debate, especially in its earlier stages. With them, however, seems to have come a conspicuous friction which, I believe, increasingly impedes research. The main problem, as it strikes this noncombatant, is that each side has been reluctant to grant much to the other, while the language has been painfully polemical at times. To one who has learned from both camps and wants to advance the assault on persistent problems rather than on each other, the quarrel has become unfortunate. Debating points often obfuscate truly important issues for power analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Frey, Frederick W., 1971. "Comment: On Issues and Nonissues in the Study of Power," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(4), pages 1081-1101, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:65:y:1971:i:04:p:1081-1101_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400137475/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward D. Mansfield, 1992. "The Concentration of Capabilities and the Onset of War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(1), pages 3-24, March.
    2. Adam Quinn & Nicholas Kitchen, 2019. "Understanding American Power: Conceptual Clarity, Strategic Priorities, and the Decline Debate," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(1), pages 5-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:65:y:1971:i:04:p:1081-1101_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.