IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v58y1964i03p642-657_08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dimensions of Conflict in the General Assembly

Author

Listed:
  • Alker, Hayward R.

Abstract

Although there has been considerable work on voting patterns in the United Nations, almost none of it has contributed cumulatively to existing theories of international relations. Methodological problems or a descriptive intent have often stood in the way of such advancement. For example, the main findings of Thomas Hovet, Jr.'s Bloc Politics in the United Nations, the most comprehensive work to date, are based on trends in the voting cohesion of regional and caucusing groups in the Assembly and time-series data on how often these groups vote with the majority.

Suggested Citation

  • Alker, Hayward R., 1964. "Dimensions of Conflict in the General Assembly," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(3), pages 642-657, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:58:y:1964:i:03:p:642-657_08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305540008151X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin Sweeney & Omar M.G. Keshk, 2005. "the Similarity of States: Using S to Compute Dyadic Interest Similarity," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(2), pages 165-187, April.
    2. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, 1975. "Measuring Systemic Polarity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(2), pages 187-216, June.
    3. Doris A. Graber, 1969. "Perceptions of Middle East conflict in the UN, 1953 -1965," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 13(4), pages 454-484, December.
    4. Simon Hug & Richard Lukács, 2014. "Preferences or blocs? Voting in the United Nations Human Rights Council," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 83-106, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:58:y:1964:i:03:p:642-657_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.