IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v54y1960i04p899-910_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The National Security Council as a Device for Interdepartmental Coordination: An Interpretation and Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Hammond, Paul Y.

Abstract

The National Security Council constitutes the most ambitious effort yet made to coordinate policy on the cabinet level in the American federal government. An examination of the experience of the NSC, together with the assumptions and expectations that went into proposing, establishing, and developing it, should help to clarify the problem of policy coordination under the President. Various proposals for a special war cabinet in the United States, usually called a Council of National Defense, date back as far as 1911. The National Defense Act of 1916 established a body by such a name, headed by the Secretary of War. The statute was so watered down from the original proposals, however, that its uses were negligible, except later as a convenient peg for the National Defense Advisory Council (NDAC) and its subsidiaries that Roosevelt called into being in 1940. After World War I, both armed services revived the idea of a more powerful Council in an effort to find some base of support for their military policies, and as a counter to proposals for unification, proposals which they both opposed because these were founded on unrealistic expectations about the sums of money that could be saved through reorganization of the service departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hammond, Paul Y., 1960. "The National Security Council as a Device for Interdepartmental Coordination: An Interpretation and Appraisal," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(4), pages 899-910, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:54:y:1960:i:04:p:899-910_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400122233/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Mennis, 1969. "Discussions and Reviews : Respectability, theory, and foreign policy analysis: a review Raymond A. Bauer and Kenneth J. Gergen (eds.), The Study of Policy Formation New York: Free Press, 1968. Pp. 380," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 13(2), pages 278-285, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:54:y:1960:i:04:p:899-910_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.