IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v26y1932i06p1148-1151_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lytton Report1

Author

Listed:
  • Dennett, Tyler

Abstract

The title is not only misleading but even obscures one of the most significant features of the report of the Commission of Enquiry of the League of Nations which was authorized by the Council on December 10, 1931, and the composition of which was approved on January 14 following. From the popular title which has been given to the report, it might be inferred that it is the work of one man, an Englishman, whereas it is the unanimous report and recommendation of five men of five nationalities—Italian, French, English, American, and German. That five men of such diverse associations could have reached an agreement upon a report so incisive and upon recommendation so comprehensive and concise is a very remarkable characteristic of the document.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennett, Tyler, 1932. "The Lytton Report1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(6), pages 1148-1151, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:26:y:1932:i:06:p:1148-1151_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400023224/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:26:y:1932:i:06:p:1148-1151_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.