IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i1p508-516_34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Campaign Finance Vouchers Do Not Expand the Diversity of Donors: Evidence from Seattle

Author

Listed:
  • YORGASON, CHENOA

Abstract

Donating to a campaign is inherently costly, and as a result the composition of campaign donors differs from the composition of the electorate. What happens when the financial barriers to campaign finance participation are removed? This paper analyzes Seattle’s recent campaign finance reform, where all registered voters receive four $25 vouchers to donate to candidates abiding by stricter campaign finance restrictions. Utilizing individual- and census block group-level data combined with administrative donation records, I find that those most mobilized by the availability of vouchers belong to groups already overrepresented within the donor pool. This finding is significant across race, income, past political participation, age, and partisanship. In some cases, the availability of vouchers appears to pull the donor pool further from parity with the larger electorate.

Suggested Citation

  • Yorgason, Chenoa, 2025. "Campaign Finance Vouchers Do Not Expand the Diversity of Donors: Evidence from Seattle," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(1), pages 508-516, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:1:p:508-516_34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055424000170/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:1:p:508-516_34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.