IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i1p40-55_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting Out of “Politics”: The Self-Fulfilling Role of Conflict Expectation

Author

Listed:
  • GROENENDYK, ERIC
  • KRUPNIKOV, YANNA
  • RYAN, JOHN BARRY
  • CONNORS, ELIZABETH C.

Abstract

In recent decades, the term “politics” has become almost synonymous with conflict. Results from eight studies show that individuals averse to conflict tend to select out of surveys and discussions explicitly labeled as “political.” This suggests that the inferences researchers draw from “political” surveys, as well as the impressions average Americans draw from explicitly “political” discussions, will be systematically biased toward conflict. We find little evidence that these effects can be attenuated by emphasizing deliberative norms. However, conflict averse individuals are more willing to discuss ostensibly political topics such as the economy, climate change, and racial inequality, despite reluctance to discuss “politics” explicitly. Moreover, they express greater interest in politics when it is defined in terms of laws and policies and debate is deemphasized. Overall, these findings suggest the expectation of conflict may have a self-fulfilling effect, as contexts deemed explicitly “political” will be composed primarily of conflict seekers.

Suggested Citation

  • Groenendyk, Eric & Krupnikov, Yanna & Ryan, John Barry & Connors, Elizabeth C., 2025. "Selecting Out of “Politics”: The Self-Fulfilling Role of Conflict Expectation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(1), pages 40-55, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:1:p:40-55_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423001417/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:1:p:40-55_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.