IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i1p1-20_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endogenous Colonial Borders: Precolonial States and Geography in the Partition of Africa

Author

Listed:
  • PAINE, JACK
  • QIU, XIAOYAN
  • RICART-HUGUET, JOAN

Abstract

We revise the conventional wisdom that Africa’s international borders were drawn arbitrarily. Europeans knew very little about most of Africa in the mid-1880s, but their self-interested goals of amassing territory prompted intensive examination of on-the-ground conditions as they formed borders. Europeans negotiated with African rulers to secure treaties and to learn about historical state frontiers, which enabled Africans to influence the border-formation process. Major water bodies, which shaped precolonial civilizations and trade, also served as focal points. We find support for these new theoretical implications using two original datasets. Quantitatively, we analyze border-location correlates using grid cells and an original spatial dataset on precolonial states. Qualitatively, we compiled information from treaties and diplomatic histories to code causal process observations for every bilateral border. Historical political frontiers directly affected 62% of all bilateral borders. Water bodies, often major ones, comprised the primary border feature much more frequently than straight lines.

Suggested Citation

  • Paine, Jack & Qiu, Xiaoyan & Ricart-Huguet, Joan, 2025. "Endogenous Colonial Borders: Precolonial States and Geography in the Partition of Africa," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(1), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:1:p:1-20_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055424000054/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:1:p:1-20_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.