IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i4p2072-2078_30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd

Author

Listed:
  • BROWN, NADIA E.
  • TORMOS-APONTE, FERNANDO
  • WONG, JANELLE

Abstract

As a discipline centered on power, political science provides an important window into potential responses to episodes of heightened attention to long-standing racial violence and inequality in the United States. During the summer of 2020, political science departments, like many other entities, issued public statements in response to the brutal murder of George Floyd and the long and ongoing history of deadly violence against Black people at the hands of law enforcement. This paper examines these statements, providing a descriptive analysis of themes raised and types of commitments to action. Rhetorical responses to racism constitute important sites for understanding how discursive power is deployed. Ultimately, we observe that proposed solutions contained in statements are not commensurate with the structural understanding of racism encapsulated in statements. These statements suggest that the status quo prevails even among those who study power. We document limited commitments to addressing racism in political statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Nadia E. & Tormos-Aponte, Fernando & Wong, Janelle, 2024. "An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(4), pages 2072-2078, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:2072-2078_30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423001375/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:2072-2078_30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.