IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i4p1873-1894_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting for Masculinity: Women’s Under-Representation in the Republican Party

Author

Listed:
  • KARPOWITZ, CHRISTOPHER F.
  • MONSON, J. QUIN
  • PREECE, JESSICA R.
  • ALDRIDGE, ALEJANDRA

Abstract

The gap between women’s representation in the Democratic and Republican parties has grown significantly in the last three decades. We argue existing explanations undervalue voters’ contributions to this trend by focusing on voter responses to candidate sex rather than candidate gender. We theorize that Republican voters (especially the most conservative) prefer masculine candidates in intraparty and entry-level elections. Because sex and gender are correlated, this limits the number of Republican women who advance through the political pipeline. Experimental vignettes from two rounds of the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (N = 2,000) and two large surveys of Republicans (N > 10,000) show that Republican (but not Democratic) voters penalize candidates with “feminine” self-presentation regardless of the candidate’s sex. Original data on the self-presentation of Republican candidates for entry-level office (N = 459) confirm Republican candidates often present themselves in gender-stereotypical ways. In short, voters play an underappreciated role in the partisan gap in women’s representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Karpowitz, Christopher F. & Monson, J. Quin & Preece, Jessica R. & Aldridge, Alejandra, 2024. "Selecting for Masculinity: Women’s Under-Representation in the Republican Party," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(4), pages 1873-1894, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:1873-1894_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423000783/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:1873-1894_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.