IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i4p1671-1687_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willing but Unable: Reassessing the Relationship between Racial Group Consciousness and Black Political Participation

Author

Listed:
  • SMITH, JASMINE CARRERA
  • CLEMONS, JARED
  • KRISHNAMURTHY, ARVIND
  • MARTINEZ, MIGUEL
  • MCLAREN, LEANN
  • WHITE, ISMAIL K.

Abstract

In this article, we offer a framework for understanding the role that racial group consciousness (RGC) plays in influencing Black Americans’ engagement in costly political action. Attempting to add clarity to decades of inconsistent and at times contradictory findings, we argue that the effect of RGC at inspiring political action among Black Americans is conditional on (1) the relevance of the political activity to achieving a well-recognized racial group outcome and (2) individual capacity to assume the cost of engaging in the activity. Analyzing data from the ANES and two behavioral experiments, we find that RGC exhibits a consistently strong relationship with engagement in low-cost political behavior, regardless of whether the behavior has some explicit group-relevant outcome. When engagement becomes more costly, however, Blacks high in RGC are only willing to assume these costs if the engagement has some clear potential for racial group benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Jasmine Carrera & Clemons, Jared & Krishnamurthy, Arvind & Martinez, Miguel & Mclaren, Leann & White, Ismail K., 2024. "Willing but Unable: Reassessing the Relationship between Racial Group Consciousness and Black Political Participation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(4), pages 1671-1687, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:1671-1687_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423000370/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:1671-1687_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.