IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i4p1643-1657_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s Wrong with Neocolonialism: The Case of Unequal Trade in Cultural Goods

Author

Listed:
  • CHAN, SHUK YING
  • PATTEN, ALAN

Abstract

Unequal patterns of cultural exchange between the Global South and Global North are sometimes labeled “neo-colonial.” What, if anything, is wrong with these patterns? Debates surrounding cultural globalization have traditionally divided proponents of free trade and cultural preservation. The article develops an alternative account grounded in a global application of the ideal of social equality. Citizens of privileged societies ought to regard and relate to citizens of disadvantaged societies as social equals. Patterns of cultural exchange play an important role in promoting these relationships. Historically, colonized peoples were often regarded as inferior based on perceived failures to produce cultural achievements. To the extent that unequal global cultural production and exchange persist, the colonial pattern remains. The duty to relate to foreigners as equals implies that Global North countries should stop pressing for cultural trade concessions and instead favor the import of cultural goods from the Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan, Shuk Ying & Patten, Alan, 2024. "What’s Wrong with Neocolonialism: The Case of Unequal Trade in Cultural Goods," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(4), pages 1643-1657, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:1643-1657_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423000795/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:4:p:1643-1657_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.