IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i3p1261-1277_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deliberation and Ethical Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Campaign Experiment in Benin

Author

Listed:
  • WANTCHEKON, LEONARD
  • GUARDADO, JENNY

Abstract

The article provides experimental evidence of the effect of candidate-citizen town-hall meetings on voters’ political behavior. The intervention took place prior to the March 2011 elections in Benin and involved 150 randomly selected villages. In the treatment group, candidates held town-hall meetings where voters deliberated over their electoral platforms. The control group was exposed to the standard campaign—that is, one-way communication of the candidate’s platform by himself or his local broker. We find that town-hall meetings led to a more informed citizenry and higher electoral participation, which diverged little along socioeconomic lines. We also observe a lower effectiveness of vote-buying attempts where town halls took place. This is consistent with town-hall deliberation promoting what we call more “ethical” voters.

Suggested Citation

  • Wantchekon, Leonard & Guardado, Jenny, 2024. "Deliberation and Ethical Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Campaign Experiment in Benin," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(3), pages 1261-1277, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:3:p:1261-1277_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423000813/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:3:p:1261-1277_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.