IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v117y2023i2p591-608_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facing Change: Gender and Climate Change Attitudes Worldwide

Author

Listed:
  • BUSH, SARAH SUNN
  • CLAYTON, AMANDA

Abstract

Gender differences in concern about climate change are highly correlated with economic development: when countries are wealthier, a gap emerges whereby women are more likely than men to express concern about our changing climate. These differences stem from cross-national variation in men’s attitudes. Men, more than women, tend to be less concerned about climate change when countries are wealthier. This article develops a new theory about the perceived costs and benefits of climate mitigation policy to explain this pattern. At the country level, the perceived benefits of mitigation tend to decrease with economic development, whereas the perceived costs increase. At the individual level, the perceived costs of mitigation tend to increase with economic development for men more than for women. Evidence from existing surveys from every world region, an original 10-country survey in the Americas and Europe, and focus groups in Peru and the United States support the theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Bush, Sarah Sunn & Clayton, Amanda, 2023. "Facing Change: Gender and Climate Change Attitudes Worldwide," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 117(2), pages 591-608, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:2:p:591-608_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055422000752/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Lodi & Agnese Sacchi & Francesco Vidoli, 2024. "Gender politics, environmental behaviours, and local territories: Evidence from Italian municipalities," Papers 2410.06091, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:2:p:591-608_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.