IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v117y2023i1p332-339_23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey Nonresponse and Mass Polarization: The Consequences of Declining Contact and Cooperation Rates

Author

Listed:
  • CAVARI, AMNON
  • FREEDMAN, GUY

Abstract

Recent studies question whether declining response rates in survey data overstate the level of polarization of Americans. At issue are the sources of declining response rates—declining contact rates, associated mostly with random polling mechanisms, or declining cooperation rates, associated with personal preferences, knowledge, and interest in politics—and their differing effects on measures of polarization. Assessing 158 surveys (2004–2018), we show that declining cooperation is the primary source of declining response rates and that it leads to survey overrepresentation of people who are more engaged in politics. Analyzing individual responses to 1,223 policy questions in those surveys, we further show that, conditional on the policy area, this survey bias overestimates or underestimates the partisan divide among Americans. Our findings question the perceived strength of mass polarization and move forward the discussion about the effect of declining survey response on generalizations from survey data.

Suggested Citation

  • Cavari, Amnon & Freedman, Guy, 2023. "Survey Nonresponse and Mass Polarization: The Consequences of Declining Contact and Cooperation Rates," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 117(1), pages 332-339, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:1:p:332-339_23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055422000399/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:1:p:332-339_23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.