IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v117y2023i1p318-324_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can’t We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics

Author

Listed:
  • ADAMS, JAMES
  • BRACKEN, DAVID
  • GIDRON, NOAM
  • HORNE, WILL
  • O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.
  • SENK, KAITLIN

Abstract

Concern over partisan resentment and hostility has increased across Western democracies. Despite growing attention to affective polarization, existing research fails to ask whether who serves in office affects mass-level interparty hostility. Drawing on scholarship on women’s behavior as elected representatives and citizens’ beliefs about women politicians, we posit the women MPs affective bonus hypothesis: all else being equal, partisans display warmer affect toward out-parties with higher proportions of women MPs. We evaluate this claim with an original dataset on women’s presence in 125 political parties in 20 Western democracies from 1996 to 2017 combined with survey data on partisans’ affective ratings of political opponents. We show that women’s representation is associated with lower levels of partisan hostility and that both men and women partisans react positively to out-party women MPs. Increasing women’s parliamentary presence could thus mitigate cross-party hostility.

Suggested Citation

  • Adams, James & Bracken, David & Gidron, Noam & Horne, Will & O’Brien, Diana Z. & Senk, Kaitlin, 2023. "Can’t We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 117(1), pages 318-324, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:1:p:318-324_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055422000491/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:1:p:318-324_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.