IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v116y2022i2p702-718_22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Television Advertising in United States Elections

Author

Listed:
  • SIDES, JOHN
  • VAVRECK, LYNN
  • WARSHAW, CHRISTOPHER

Abstract

We provide a comprehensive assessment of the influence of television advertising on United States election outcomes from 2000–2018. We expand on previous research by including presidential, Senate, House, gubernatorial, Attorney General, and state Treasurer elections and using both difference-in-differences and border-discontinuity research designs to help identify the causal effect of advertising. We find that televised broadcast campaign advertising matters up and down the ballot, but it has much larger effects in down-ballot elections than in presidential elections. Using survey and voter registration data from multiple election cycles, we also show that the primary mechanism for ad effects is persuasion, not the mobilization of partisans. Our results have implications for the study of campaigns and elections as well as voter decision making and information processing.

Suggested Citation

  • Sides, John & Vavreck, Lynn & Warshaw, Christopher, 2022. "The Effect of Television Advertising in United States Elections," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(2), pages 702-718, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:116:y:2022:i:2:p:702-718_22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305542100112X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajzenman, Nicolás & Ardanaz, Martín & Cruces, Guillermo & Feierherd, Germán & Lunghi, Ignacio, 2024. "Unraveling the Paradox of Anticorruption Messaging: Experimental Evidence from a Tax Administration Reform," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13555, Inter-American Development Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:116:y:2022:i:2:p:702-718_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.