IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v115y2021i4p1242-1257_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions During Televised Debates

Author

Listed:
  • BOUSSALIS, CONSTANTINE
  • COAN, TRAVIS G.
  • HOLMAN, MIRYA R.
  • MÜLLER, STEFAN

Abstract

Voters evaluate politicians not just by what they say, but also how they say it, via facial displays of emotions and vocal pitch. Candidate characteristics can shape how leaders use—and how voters react to—nonverbal cues. Drawing on role congruity expectations, we study how the use of and reactions to facial, vocal, and textual communication in political debates varies by candidate gender. Relying on full-length videos of four German federal election debates (2005–2017) and a minor party debate, we use video, audio, and text data to measure candidate facial displays of emotion, vocal pitch, and speech sentiment. Consistent with our expectations, Angela Merkel expresses less anger than her male opponents, but she is just as emotive in other respects. Combining these measures of emotional expression with continuous responses recorded by live audiences, we find that voters punish Merkel for anger displays and reward her happiness and general emotional displays.

Suggested Citation

  • Boussalis, Constantine & Coan, Travis G. & Holman, Mirya R. & Müller, Stefan, 2021. "Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions During Televised Debates," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1242-1257, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:115:y:2021:i:4:p:1242-1257_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055421000666/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiffany BARNES & Charles CRABTREE & MATSUO Akitaka & ONO Yoshikuni, 2022. "Women Use More Positive Language than Men: Candidates’ strategic use of emotive language in election campaigns," Discussion papers 22114, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    2. Felix Ettensperger & Thomas Waldvogel & Uwe Wagschal & Samuel Weishaupt, 2023. "How to convince in a televised debate: the application of machine learning to analyze why viewers changed their winner perception during the 2021 German chancellor discussion," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:115:y:2021:i:4:p:1242-1257_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.