IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v115y2021i1p339-346_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Significance of Policy Outputs with Positive Unlabeled Learning

Author

Listed:
  • ZUBEK, RADOSLAW
  • DASGUPTA, ABHISHEK
  • DOYLE, DAVID

Abstract

Identifying important policy outputs has long been of interest to political scientists. In this work, we propose a novel approach to the classification of policies. Instead of obtaining and aggregating expert evaluations of significance for a finite set of policy outputs, we use experts to identify a small set of significant outputs and then employ positive unlabeled (PU) learning to search for other similar examples in a large unlabeled set. We further propose to automate the first step by harvesting “seed” sets of significant outputs from web data. We offer an application of the new approach by classifying over 9,000 government regulations in the United Kingdom. The obtained estimates are successfully validated against human experts, by forecasting web citations, and with a construct validity test.

Suggested Citation

  • Zubek, Radoslaw & Dasgupta, Abhishek & Doyle, David, 2021. "Measuring the Significance of Policy Outputs with Positive Unlabeled Learning," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(1), pages 339-346, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:115:y:2021:i:1:p:339-346_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305542000091X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:115:y:2021:i:1:p:339-346_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.