IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v113y2019i3p743-761_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Moderates Better Representatives than Extremists? A Theory of Indirect Representation

Author

Listed:
  • PATTY, JOHN W.
  • PENN, ELIZABETH MAGGIE

Abstract

Few, if any, elected representatives are capable of unilaterally implementing their platforms. Rather, they choose between options generated by other actors and/or external events. We present a theory of voters’ preferences over representatives who will cast votes on their behalf, and show that in this setting voters’ preferences over candidates’ platforms will not look like voters’ preferences over policies. We demonstrate that these induced preferences for representation tend to favor more extreme representatives, and we present two models of electoral competition in which induced preferences over representatives lead to elite polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Patty, John W. & Penn, Elizabeth Maggie, 2019. "Are Moderates Better Representatives than Extremists? A Theory of Indirect Representation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(3), pages 743-761, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:113:y:2019:i:3:p:743-761_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055419000261/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:113:y:2019:i:3:p:743-761_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.