IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v101y2007i03p505-525_07.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion

Author

Listed:
  • PHILPOTT, DANIEL

Abstract

This essay takes on the broad question—what explains the political pursuits of religious actors?—by exploring two powerful influences on these pursuits. The first is differentiation, or the degree of autonomy between religious actors and states in their basic authority. The second is political theology, the set of ideas that religious actors hold about political authority and justice. Through global comparisons across religions, regions, and states, it seeks to establish the effect of both influences on two political pursuits in which religion's role is hotly debated today: support for democratization and political violence, including communal violence and terrorism. It concludes with lessons learned commonly from the analysis of both pursuits.

Suggested Citation

  • Philpott, Daniel, 2007. "Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 101(3), pages 505-525, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:101:y:2007:i:03:p:505-525_07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055407070372/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gizem Arikan & Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom, 2019. "“I was hungry and you gave me food”: Religiosity and attitudes toward redistribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Jori Breslawski & Brandon Ives, 2019. "Killing for God? Factional Violence on the Transnational Stage," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(3), pages 617-643, March.
    3. Weiffen, Brigitte, 2008. "Liberalizing Autocracies in the Gulf Region? Reform Strategies in the Face of a Cultural-Economic Syndrome," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 2586-2604, December.
    4. Matthias Basedau & Simone Gobien & Lisa Hoffmann, 2022. "Identity threats and ideas of superiority as drivers of religious violence? Evidence from a survey experiment in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(3), pages 395-408, May.
    5. Stephen Chaudoin & David Smith & Johannes Urpelainen, 2014. "American evangelicals and domestic versus international climate policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 441-469, December.
    6. Lisa Hoffmann & Matthias Basedau & Simone Gobien & Sebastian Prediger, 2020. "Universal Love or One True Religion? Experimental Evidence of the Ambivalent Effect of Religious Ideas on Altruism and Discrimination," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 603-620, July.
    7. de Juan, Alexander & Vüllers, Johannes, 2010. "Religious Peace Activism – The Rational Element of Religious Elites' Decision-making Processes," GIGA Working Papers 130, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    8. Jan Fałkowski & Przemysław Kurek, 2020. "The transformation of supreme values: Evidence from Poland on salvation through civic engagement," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 113-129, October.
    9. Armand, Alex & Augsburg, Britta & Bancalari, Antonella & Kameshwara, Kalyan Kumar, 2024. "Religious proximity and misinformation: Experimental evidence from a mobile phone-based campaign in India," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Joe Devine & Graham K. Brown & Séverine Deneulin, 2015. "Contesting the Boundaries of Religion in Social Mobilization," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 10(1), pages 22-47, April.
    11. Basedau, Matthias & de Juan, Alexander, 2008. "The "Ambivalence of the Sacred" in Africa: The Impact of Religion on Peace and Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa," GIGA Working Papers 70, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    12. Anna Y. Kulkova, 2014. "Religiosity And Political Participation In Contemporary Russia: A Quantitative Analysis," HSE Working papers WP BRP 20/PS/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck & Jensen, Peter Sandholt, 2019. "Preaching democracy: The second Vatican council and the third wave," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 525-540.
    14. Basedau, Matthias & Strüver, Georg & Vüllers, Johannes & Wegenast, Tim, 2011. "Do Religious Factors Impact Armed Conflict? Empirical Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," GIGA Working Papers 168, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    15. Basedau, Matthias & Strüver, Georg & Vüllers, Johannes, 2011. "Cutting Bread or Cutting Throats? – Findings from a New Database on Religion, Violence and Peace in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1990 to 2008," GIGA Working Papers 159, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    16. Daphna Canetti & Stevan E Hobfoll & Ami Pedahzur & Eran Zaidise, 2010. "Much ado about religion," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 47(5), pages 575-587, September.
    17. Nilay Saiya & Anthony Scime, 2015. "Explaining religious terrorism: A data-mined analysis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(5), pages 487-512, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:101:y:2007:i:03:p:505-525_07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.