IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v16y2022i1p95-118_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tree-based models for variable annuity valuation: parameter tuning and empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Quan, Zhiyu
  • Gan, Guojun
  • Valdez, Emiliano

Abstract

Variable annuities have become popular retirement and investment vehicles due to their attractive guarantee features. Nonetheless, managing the financial risks associated with the guarantees poses great challenges for insurers. One challenge is risk quantification, which involves frequent valuation of the guarantees. Insurers rely on the use of Monte Carlo simulation for valuation as the guarantees are too complicated to be valued by closed-form formulas. However, Monte Carlo simulation is computationally intensive. In this paper, we empirically explore the use of tree-based models for constructing metamodels for the valuation of the guarantees. In particular, we consider traditional regression trees, tree ensembles, and trees based on unbiased recursive partitioning. We compare the performance of tree-based models to that of existing models such as ordinary kriging and generalised beta of the second kind (GB2) regression. Our results show that tree-based models are efficient in producing accurate predictions and the gradient boosting method is considered the most superior in terms of prediction accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan, Zhiyu & Gan, Guojun & Valdez, Emiliano, 2022. "Tree-based models for variable annuity valuation: parameter tuning and empirical analysis," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 95-118, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:95-118_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499521000075/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:95-118_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.