IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v1y1981i2p501-517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a Free Market in Forest Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Charles R. Batten

    (California Forest Protective Association.)

Abstract

Conflict over the use and management of America’s forest lands and resources intensified during the 1970s, with debates over the use of the undeveloped lands inventoried by the Forest Service, the divi- sion of lands in Alaska, the establishment and expansion of certain national parks acquired from private landowners, and the regulation of forest practices on private lands. These conflicts date from Coloni- al times, when British attempts to reserve all the white pine trees in New England for the kings navy were among the grievances that led to the American Revolution.’ Those who wage the battle for conser- vation argue that resources must be conserved by government decree. Their position is based largely on a distrust of private owner- ship and of the free market as an allocator of natural resources. Their opponents point to the growing demands for wood products, water, livestock forage, and minerals, and seek to develop them...

Suggested Citation

  • Charles R. Batten, 1981. "Toward a Free Market in Forest Resources," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 501-517, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:1:y:1981:i:2:p:501-517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1981/11/cj1n2-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    property rights; land; regulation; government; forest; wildlife; free markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:1:y:1981:i:2:p:501-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.